The final chapter? The statement from Ars:
On Friday afternoon, Ars Technica published an article containing fabricated quotations generated by an AI tool and attributed to a source who did not say them. That is a serious failure of our standards. Direct quotations must always reflect what a source actually said.
Ars Technica retracted an article about how AI is making the world worse because...
the Ars article itself contained AI-generated quotes in it.
Welp, we had a decent run, folks. But it's time to call it.
Not sure if it’s useful for anyone. 0 dependency parser for plist (xml only) in the browser
r2web now has a built-in code editor 🤟, Edit radare2 scripts right in-browser, Fully mobile UI friendly as always.
RE: https://mastodon.social/@campuscodi/116063028992957549
This is wild and I hope Palo customers give them a lot of shit over this. "Attribution is irrelevant" is such a chicken shit way to appease a government that is positioning itself to cause real harm to real people by attacking real world critical infrastructure.
The change, the sources said, was ordered by Palo Alto executives because they were concerned by the software ban and feared drawing retaliation from Chinese authorities, either against the company’s personnel in China or its clients elsewhere.
Put a fucking lampshade over the heads of those executives. Goddamn cowards. The relevance of attribution is for their customers to decide, not them
2026, the year of the AI-driven attacker that could do back flips, they said.
Meanwhile, there's a magic number that allows Auth Bypass against Ivanti EPM (CVE-2026-1603)
something about a pledge 🙄
Now that we have the infinite monkeys as software, could someone let them know that we don't need someone to write the complete works of Shakespeare again? We have libraries for that.
When I said that your discord clone doesn’t need e2ee, I got a lot of comments along the lines of “ then how would I use it to organize the revolution!” The answer is: you don’t. If you have more users than can comfortably share a Signal chat and hence want to use discord or something like it, you cannot POSSIBLY be vetting all of them to a high standard of trust. Your logs ARE leaking. End-to-end encryption between more people than can fit around a dinner table is pointless.
This article confirms what I already assumed, that “open source [information sense, not code sense] intelligence gathering on social media” includes, for the US government, asking for links to join groups that may *feel* private. My own discord has literally like a thousand idlers. It would be very *lucky* if none of them were logging for potentially nefarious purposes! And I remind the active users of this occasionally.
https://www.kenklippenstein.com/p/exclusive-ice-masks-up-in-more-ways
Had a case this week of a fairly secure deployment of BeyondTrust, but vulnerable to CVE-2026-1731. With basically zero egress, I implemented a timing oracle POC instead. Takes about 20 minutes to get the ls command output in this demo, but hey, it works! :D
Today is an excellent day to enjoy free, ad-free, non-stop #MTV #nostalgia
Capture XPC traffics and backtraces in Wireshark because why not
Pwning Supercomputers - A 20yo vulnerability in Munge https://blog.lexfo.fr/munge-heap-buffer-overflow.html
The war waged by the tech authoritarian oligarchy against the media has reached a new level:
#Palantir is suing us. Us, the Republik Magazin.
A small Swiss media company, funded by readers, founded in 2018 and free of advertising. I am not aware of any other media company globally that Palantir is currently targeting so aggressively.
What is this about? Together with my wonderful colleagues at the WAV research collective Jenny Steiner, Lorenz Naegeli, Marguerite Meyer, and Balz Oertli, we published a two-part series on Palantir's activities in Switzerland on December 8 and 9.
Using an extensive corpus of documents – which we obtained thanks to the Freedom of Information Act – we were able to trace a sales campaign over a period of seven years. Palantir tried to get in with many federal authorities – and was rejected everywhere.
And we also found out that the Swiss Army Staff evaluated the software and came to the conclusion that the army should refrain from using Palantir products.
Among other risks, they feared that data would be passed on to the US authorities.
Palantir is not just any company. ICE uses its products to hunt down migrants in the US. The Israeli army IDF uses the software in its Gaza offensive. The British health authority NHS has made itself dependent on the products for data analysis during the pandemic. And CEO #AlexKarp displays inhuman and aggressive rhetoric towards Europe, while the company itself advertises the “optimization of the kill chain.”
These are all facts, repeatedly verified and published by renowned media outlets. Our research relating to Switzerland and Zurich is based on this.
In addition to analyzing documents, we also spoke to various sources – including Palantir executives here in Zurich. The quotes used were presented to them and approved. Of course, we always adhered to the high standards of journalistic work. We conducted a thorough fact check before publication.
But the company doesn't want us to write the truth.
After the US company owned by right-wing tech billionaire #PeterThiel dedicated an absurd blog post to us, claiming some misinformation (such as that they had not participated in official tenders with the federal administration, a point we never claimed. On the contrary: we spoke from the outset of attempts to establish contact, sales talks, informal meetings, business as usual), after the Global Director of Privacy & Civil Liberties (PCL) Engineering and contact person for Swiss media Courtney Bowman launched personal attacks against us in LinkedIn comments between Christmas and New Year (“partisan fear-mongering”), Palantir's Swiss lawyers demanded a counterstatement on December 29.
We rejected this in its entirety.
In January, they demanded the same thing again. We rejected it again.
And now we see each other in court.
But why all this?
Our research on the Swiss army report caused a huge international media response. The Guardian and the Austrian newspaper Der Standard reported on the Swiss army's rejection. Numerous financial portals and stock market magazines picked up our news (which could have consequences for the overvalued stock market company Palantir).
And Chaos Computer Club spokesperson Constanze Kurz presented our research to a huge audience at the renowned IT conference Chaos Communication Congress in Hamburg at the end of December.
All of this is making Palantir nervous.
We have now submitted a comprehensive defense brief. We can substantiate all of our findings with several documents and publicly available media reports.
We trust in the rule of law and freedom of the press in this country.
In keeping with yesterday's event “Zurich, little Big Tech City” at the Gessneralle, where we first announced this news exclusively to the audience on site:
World politics will soon be negotiated in Zurich: freedom of the press, the facts about ICE, Trump, Israel, Karp, tech authoritarianism.
The truth.
All this at the Zurich Commercial Court.
We will not be intimidated. And we will keep you informed.
this is going to be vague, but I don't know how to offer details without explaining everything, which would take a lot more words than I have available on a platform like this. in short though: Open Book Touch is going to blow your freaking mind straight out the back of your head. Even if you know to expect it, I promise: you may think you're ready, but you're not.
Watch this space. https://www.crowdsupply.com/oddly-specific-objects/open-book-touch
Matplotlib maintainer Scott Shambaugh has blogged about the AI agent blog shaming experience now.
https://theshamblog.com/an-ai-agent-published-a-hit-piece-on-me/