Anyone interested in #ReverseEngineering a pointlessly #NDA'd "bus" system that makes it harder for no valid reason to resurrect some otherwise still functional #SATCOM gear?
https://www.beamcommunications.com/document/9-manual-9522b-l-band-transceiver/file page 15
I've just upgraded Turbo Intruder with a shiny new algorithm called HTTP Anomaly Rank, which automatically finds the most unusual responses in your attack! Here's a quick demo, full details in the writeup below: https://youtu.be/z92GobdN40Y
radare
Friendly reminder from @buherator about your thoughts on reshare and r4ghidra projects: #poll
r4ghidra-r2web - https://mbbkepfl.formester.com/f/GfJNIHusN
r4ghidra-REPL - https://mbbkepfl.formester.com/f/invMupinF
REshare - https://mbbkepfl.formester.com/f/rLvls916S
You install PSP on your operator workstation and the vendor starts spying on you.
https://www.huntress.com/blog/rare-look-inside-attacker-operation
That's ⦠special. Scientists in the field of artifical intelligence telling von der Leyen to stop AGI buzzwording.
@keepassxc I think you misunderstood the āplausible-looking generationā criticism. The issue is not that the LLM is created to purposefully slip changes past reviewers, that would indeed be quite silly. It is trained by optimizing for plausible looking output ā in essence the LLM ātriesā to generate code that looks plausibly correct and such code is correct only inasmuch as code being correct is correlated with code looking correct. In contract humans when coding are trying to create correct code, and correctness there is related to how well a given human can generate correct code. The worry is that when a human makes a mistake it has a much higher chance of looking like a mistake, while LLMs are more likely to create correct-looking mistakes, because they are optimized for creating correct-looking output in general. This is what people mean when they say that LLMs will āsneakā mistakes past reviewers, and perhaps a reason to at least have different approaches to reviewing these two kinds of code.
Iām not sure what to think about the change in general, given what I know about LLMs your approach still makes me quite uneasy, but probably not enough to switch to a different password manager. Anyway, just wanted to explain the apparent confusion about this specific argument.
Oh, and since Iām writing to you already ā thanks a lot for maintaining KeePassXC, itās on the short list of software that works exactly as I like and I really have no complaints about. 
Looks like the need to fire staff to cover AI costs has hit the Windows team
RIP Windows Insider