Döntött az Európai Parlament, ezzel a pedofil tartalmak előtt megnyílt az út az interneten
Kedves index. Latom ti is televagytok inkompetens barmokkal.
@datarama TLDR: One of the Hungarian news portals declared that the EU Parliament not voting for ChatControl is exactly the same thing as if they voted for welcoming pedophile content on the internet.
(A portal that's allegedly not an outlet of the current government, who are very much pro-ChatControl. Turns out the other party that wants to replace them is also pro-ChatControl. The single Hungarian MEP against ChatControl is a member of a party that's further to the right than our fascist goverment. Go figure.)
@algernon The (former, as of a couple of days ago) Danish government *proposed* the now-rejected version of Chat Control.
@algernon The election here, btw, led to the most chaotic government formation landscape in my lifetime - possibly the most chaotic since the end of WWII.
Denmark has negative parliamentarianism, so a government can be formed as long as it doesn't have a parliamentary majority *opposing* it. Nearly every government we've had since 1945 has been minority governments with parliamentary coalitions backing them. Traditionally there's been two blocs - a "red bloc" consisting of socialists and left-leaning centrists, and a "blue bloc" consisting of right-leaning centrists, liberals, conservatives and the far right. But now, one of our former PMs runs a centrist party, the Moderates, that has refused to support either traditional bloc, and neither of the two blocs can form a government without his MPs (though the red bloc is larger than the blue this time). And given the various demands from each party, it currently looks impossible to form a government at all.
The social democrats won't back a government unless they get the PM position.
The socialist people's party won't back a government unless they get ministerial seats, and also they won't serve in a government together with the liberal or conservative party.
The red-green alliance (our farthest-left party) refuses to back a government that has any ministerial seats to the right of the Moderates.
The older slightly-left centrist party won't back a government unless they get ministerial seats.
The Moderates won't back a government unless they get ministerial seats *and* the government isn't dependent on support from either the red-green alliance or any of the three far-right parties.
The liberals won't back a government that has social democrats in it at all.
The conservatives will only back a government if they get ministerial seats.
The Danish people's party (one of the far-right parties) won't back a government that has Moderates in it.
The Denmark Democrats (another far-right party) will only back a government that excludes everything to the left of the liberals.
The Citizen's Party (tiny far-right party) will not back any possible government at all.
The most insane constraint solver problem ever. Danish politics used to be *boring*!
Denmark has negative parliamentarianism, so a government can be formed as long as it doesn't have a parliamentary majority opposing it.
blinks
That sounds crazy. What happens if no solution can be reached? Because it looks like there isn't one, unless one of the parties concedes (and it sounds like that's the last thing they'd do).
@algernon Nobody knows, because it's never happened before. If they end up giving up, another election will probably called.
But our constitution does say that in the interim period between a government leaving and a new one being formed, the outgoing government serves as a caretaker government which is only allowed to carry out purely administrative duties ("keeping the lights on", basically) and handle national emergencies.
@datarama Sounds "fun". :(