Conversation

On the morning of the 13th day of the year we have received *checks notes* 13 vulnerability reports on Hackerone this year.

None a confirmed vulnerability.

1
5
0

I suppose the upside is that lots of people are scrutinizing and try really hard to poke holes.

1
0
0

Ironically, we have also received complaints from people who get annoyed when we disclose so many rubbish reports on Hackerone...

https://github.com/curl/curl/issues/20245

3
4
0

and of course some of the people I ridicule, ban and expose in these reports come back to me all up in arms about them being completely innocent and they did not know and now I have ruined their professional lives because their cool hacker aliases are now tainted.

6
2
0

@bagder Very sad indeed.

But we *do* let reports through if the hacker alias is really cool. Which, in these cases, they really werenโ€˜t. ๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿ’๐Ÿปโ€โ™‚๏ธ

1
0
0

@icing @bagder You gave them a second chance at getting cooler, if you think about it.

0
0
0

@bagder huh??? Doesn't curl policy explicitly mention that the use of AI must be disclosed? Is it not entirely their own fault that they always miss this part?

0
0
0

@bagder You mean I can't keep using "The Master of Disaster" on GitHub???

1
0
0

@jwz pfft, there are not even *one* "leet speak" letter in that name! ๐Ÿ˜

0
0
0

@bagder
> it clogs hacktivity for people wanting to read good disclosures

I don't user hackerone but I'd imagine there are filters in the UI to hide these?

1
0
0

@bagder, I suppose that's great ad for their company, having a GitHub account that was literally used only to complain that you're disclosing how incompetent they are.

0
0
0

@bagder ๐ŸŽป โ€“ pity there isnโ€™t an emoji with an even smaller one.

0
0
0

@bagder If they don't check their AI slop before posting, it's up to them to take the (rightful) beating for it.

No mercy.

0
0
0