[RSS] Don't Be a CVE Dummy

https://jericho.blog/2024/11/28/dont-be-a-cve-dummy/

"So please, if you are writing documentation and need to use dummy CVE identifiers, please use one of the ones MITRE designated a decade ago"

@todb @zmanion Based on the post I'm afraid including error detection in new ID's would cause a Hell of a mess at the consumers side :(

@todb @buherator Well the new-ish rules say to use "CVE-1900-*": https://www.cve.org/ResourcesSupport/AllResources/CNARules#section_5-4_Example_or_Test_CVE_IDs

Does anyone know how @attritionorg made that list? Seems similar to examples here: https://cve.mitre.org/cve/identifiers/syntaxchange.html

@todb @buherator I'd be down with annual automated reservation of a documented set of example IDs, if people really want current-looking examples. I think "CVE-1900-*" is simpler tho.